S.M. Douglas

Welcome to the home of author S.M. Douglas.

Author: S.M. Douglas (page 7 of 8)

Horror, Science-Fiction, and Action: Doing it Right in the ’80s

I have previously discussed just how good the early ’80s were in terms of horror films. In addition, I have discussed why the best horror film of all-time was a pioneer in terms of effectively blending the horror/adventure genres. Let’s build upon those discussions and look at several 1980s films that successfully brought together three of my favorite genres: horror, science-fiction, and action.

The year 1984 produced a bevy of entertaining films that rank it as one of the great years in movie-making history.  No list of 1984’s best would be complete without The Terminator.

terminator-poster

We all know the plot and particulars of The Terminator. What really made the movie resonate was the way in which a classic science fiction trope of time travel was layered onto an early ’80s slasher style unstoppable villain. From there, the film’s centerpiece was arguably not the final confrontation between the Terminator and Sarah Connor, a good action sequence in and of itself. Instead, the Terminator’s mid-film assault on the police station harboring Sarah Connor has since become one of the iconic 80’s action sequences. This in a film filled with above average action scenes that include the gunfight at the disco Tech Noir and a car chase featuring a dueling shotgun battle. James Cameron wrote and directed Terminator and perhaps it is no surprise that he also crafted Aliens.

aliens-poster

Released in 1986, Aliens accomplishes the tricky feat of being a sequel that is ranked by many the near equal of its predecessor.  1979’s Alien was a horror movie grounded in science fiction. However, Aliens can best be described as an action movie with strong horror and science fiction elements. Though the action and violence are stunningly done it is in the in-between or “down time” scenes where Aliens really shows it’s teeth, leaving the viewer with an almost constant feeling of dread. Put simply, there is an unrelenting intensity to Aliens that few movies can achieve.

If heavy action is a central element of Aliens it’s taken one step further in our third and final movie in this list: 1987’s Predator.

predator-poster

Is the testosterone too high at times?  Sure. Can the dialogue be somewhat stilted or even schlocky? Of course. Nevertheless, what is perhaps the quintessential Schwarzenegger film is still fun and entertaining nearly thirty years later. So much so it is almost impossible to pull your eyes away given the film’s rapid pace, solid special effects, and the way the viewer is immersed in the jungle where the action takes place.  This last point is important. Director John McTiernan does a wonderful job of using the jungle as a secondary monster to the titular Predator stalking his prey.

I have staked my upcoming novel Apex Predator (to be published early next month) on the concept that blending genres is a great way to produce an entertaining experience for readers or viewers alike. Few decades can match the 1980s in terms of producing multiple films that stand the test of time and combine horror, science-fiction, and action so well. This list could have easily been expanded if for no other reason than 1982’s The Thing. Nevertheless, I’ll leave that one for another day. In the meantime, can anyone guess the only two actors to have played characters killed by the Terminator, Alien, and Predator?

The Horror Writer’s Journey Part Two: Juxtaposed Against Lessons from Recent DC Comics Film Disasters

Two months ago I published part one of this insider look at the final pre-publication stages of the writing process. Since then, I have been a busy little bee. So busy, I wasn’t going to publish anything new for at least another week as I wrap up my final round of proof reading before my manuscript is submitted for distribution.  However, the recent mistakes made by the DC Comics film franchise almost demand a response if for no other reason than the lessons they can provide for the aspiring novelist. As encapsulated by perhaps the most awkwardly long blog post title I have ever written.

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice and Suicide Squad are our key reference points in this discussion. Though the latter’s foibles are all over the internet, let’s start with Batman v Superman. First off, I’m a huge fan of the Christoper Nolan Batman films and am one of the few people who thought Man of Steel was a good Superman movie. Minus the fact Superman kills Zod and lays waste to Metropolis in the process – two huge no-no’s that played a key role in the film’s lukewarm reception.

Nevertheless, and though I like it dark, Batman v Superman manages the dubious task of attempting to be so grim it sucks the entertainment value right out of the equation. If this weren’t bad enough Batman v Superman also tries to do way too much. This is done via introducing a slew of iconic DC characters to the big screen in a rushed and botched manner that fails to build the anticipation that otherwise accompany, say, Wonder Woman getting her own first-time feature length film.

This isn’t an essay on all that is wrong with the DC film universe. That said, stuffing Wonder Woman into a Superman movie that already has Batman levered into it was a huge mistake, and this is notwithstanding Wonder Woman being one of film’s highlights. And don’t get me started on this being a co-Batman/Superman movie. Little about Batman v Superman even remotely feels like the Christoper Nolan batman films that include what is arguably the greatest comic book movie of all time – The Dark Knight. No, Batman v Superman is a Zach Snyder Superman movie all the way. However, let’s get back to the trying to do to much mistake. Because that’s also a key problem with Suicide Squad, another movie of enormous promise squandered.

Suicide Squad

Suicide Squad is problematic on a number of levels. Even so, it’s biggest issues are related to the basic fact that that film does not know what it is and in the manner in which it tries, once again, to do to much. Both of these are related. The issues surrounding the characters, some of whom just magically appear while others vanish from the film without explanation are part and parcel of the film’s larger identity problems.

suicide-squad-movie-characters

For instance, Suicide Squad‘s tone is all over the map. At one time it was being marketed as an almost comedic light hearted action film, yet there are many scenes that are undoubtedly dark.  This is a product of the studio’s decision to take David Ayer’s grim looking original cut and meld it with the studio’s own contemporaneously produced cut that test audiences seemed to approve of – all of which led to extensive last minute re-shooting which when coupled with the rush of characters introduced and in some cases forgotten results in the film’s disjointed feel. This is a process only exacerbated by Suicide Squad’s  awkward treatment of one of the greatest comic book villains of all time: The Joker.

Thankfully, I didn’t have to go back and completely revamp my manuscript over the past two months following its return from my editor. My delays are more over my obsession with getting the words right as well as last minute struggles nailing down the logistics of publication. Which as a writer is where you want to be in the weeks before the release of your work. This is where Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice and Suicide Squad offer their greatest lessons.

Creating a product that is grim is a perfectly acceptable form of entertainment. One need look no further than the superb Showtime series Penny Dreadful for a prime example of this simple truth. The key however, is to remember the entertainment component. The other key is in knowing how important it is to have a clear vision of what you are trying to accomplish with your work and how much the story will drive everything else. Both of the DC films discussed here missed those important points.

In failing to find and establish an identity Batman v Superman and Suicide Squad not only didn’t entertain, but ended up compensating by stuffing into their respective running lengths all sorts of characters that they couldn’t possibly do justice. Trying to do too much is almost laudable if done for the right reasons. That wasn’t the case here. Knowing what we know about big Hollywood studios the right reasons, like actually trying to make a film the audience will love without rushing to duplicate what the Marvel franchise spent nearly a decade doing, was not part of the equation in the case of these films. This offers another key point, too many studios or writers are in a hurry to set up a franchise of bankable movies or books when they need to slow down and get it right the first time. The life of a writer is a journey. Done right, everything else will follow.

Why So Little Love for William The Werewolf?

I participate in quite a few werewolf centered social media outlets, and I’ve noticed something of late. When people discuss innovative or exciting werewolves from the past three decades of cinema history the name William Corvinus rarely comes up. Why? I mean look at him, he’s a beast.

William Corvinus

And he has a great backstory. William was more than just a denizen of the Underworld film series. He was one of the central characters, as the founding father of all lycans (as second generation werewolves are termed in the Underworld mythos).  Turned in the 5th century A.D. he was the first of his kind. William was an incredibly destructive beast; roaming the countryside, killing thousands, and turning hundreds more people into werewolves.

William Corvinus Has a Snack

It took six centuries to hunt and capture him. For eight hundred years thereafter he was imprisoned. But this was the most impressive part. When he was finally released, and in spite of being heavily weakened from having not fed in centuries, he still proved a powerful foe. He fought a combined force of well armed humans and hybrid immortals to a near standstill, until the strongest of the hybrid creatures finally killed him.

Therein lies part of the reason for William’s relative anonymity. Much of his story was backstory. The one exception being the wonderful medieval-winter-time vignette that opened the second film in the series. Had the second movie featured a few more flashbacks to William’s story then the epic concluding fight between the major immortal characters would have been that much more powerful, and it would have made for a better viewing experience.

But because William’s history happened off-camera audiences were not allowed to appreciate his awesome capabilities. I will never understand the film maker’s decision to use exposition to portray what could have been one of the best cinematic werewolves ever. This represented a major flaw, one of many, that undermined what had the potential to be a great series of films if for no other reason than the fresh ideas it delivered to the general public in terms of werewolf design. What I mean is that for a Hollywood produced mass-market film (and not a graphic novel, comic-book, or other artist driven illustration) William was a well thought out creature.

William_Underworldjpg

Quibble if you may with his white fur and eyes, but look at that bone structure and musculature. For instance, werewolves are sometimes portrayed as being incredibly fast. But those same werewolves when shown onscreen have large upper bodies and spindly little legs. Cough, cough, ahem….Dog Soldiers (an otherwise fantastic film). This is not the case with William. Look at those legs. Long, muscular, and with huge feet and powerful calves. These things would make Arnold Schwarzenegger proud. They are exactly what one would expect to see on a creature with explosive speed and leaping ability. In addition William’s muzzle is suitably canine without being so wolfish as to be….well…a wolf. It’s truly a shame that this interesting creation spent far less time onscreen than this guy:

Craven_Underworld

You were robbed, William.

williamcrouchroar

Apex Predator Update: The Horror Writer’s Journey

I’ve been getting questions about when my upcoming novel Apex Predator will be published. I am thrilled to say it will be soon. In the meantime I’m excited by my readers enthusiasm. However, let it be known that the writing process is an interesting one.  This is even more true once the manuscript is “complete”, for that’s when the real work begins.  Given the multitude of decisions I am currently agonizing over (regarding formatting, editing, cover art, fonts, and so on….) I will be regularly posting in the weeks to come about those final steps that go into trying to make a manuscript three years in the making into a book worth spending time on.

For instance, there are the decisions that need to be made surrounding the editing process.  For some authors it’s easy. They’re naturals, capable of producing a solid effort in just a couple of drafts. Horror author Steve Vance comes to mind. Last year I interviewed him for my blog Random Pop Culture (now incorporated into this website). I found myself simultaneously delighted as a reader, and insanely jealous as an author. That’s because Vance admitted that his editing process involves maybe a couple of drafts. On the other hand I have been over my book at least a dozen times in the past nine months. This includes the requisite month without looking at it, in hopes that fresh eyes will catch things they missed – and did they.

Perhaps because of this process I finally bit the bullet, and hired a professional editor. For financial reasons it was not an easy decision. However, I decided that if my book was to be the best product it possibly could then it needed professional editing. I have seen too many books where a good pair of objective eyes would have made all the difference. The same was true of mine. I sent my new editor a writing sample a few weeks ago. Though she said there was much to commend, she also came back with a host of questions and comments that made my head spin. The kind of stuff that was staring me right in the face, but which I missed because I was looking too hard.

By the way, the process of finding my new editor was actually relatively painless. Several months ago I joined the Create Space forum. So far I’ve asked for help twice – each time I have been inundated with wonderful guidance. In this case the advice also included a short list of editors worth looking into. This has taught me a valuable lesson about the importance of participating in writing forums and communities – a decision that has landed me a wonderful editor.

I know many of you will say sure an editor is great to have, but there’s the cost. And there’s no question about it, to pay for a pro is a far more costly step than getting your English major buddy to read over your MS. But trust me, it’s worth it. People talk about a book’s cover, but if they purchase that same book and every few pages something jarring smacks them in the face then it won’t take more than a matter of weeks before your Amazon page is littered with the kind of reviews that will sink years of effort.

Speaking of the book’s cover that’s another major consideration with it’s own set of headaches, but I’ll speak about that in the weeks to come. In the meantime I’ve been hemming and hawing over other decisions. These include whether to include black and white illustrations, maps, a bibliography, and much more. Please stay tuned, and feel free to give your opinions.

For instance, I would love to know how many of you find intriguing the idea of illustrations in a werewolf book. Or are you like Stephen King, and as he as often said the less described about your character’s appearance the better. The idea there being so that your reader can create their own mental images as to how characters look. This is a tricky decision, as can be seen by the following example.

In the best-selling Lee Child authored Jack Reacher books the protagonist is a big muscular brute of a man. But the subsequent film had Tom Cruise and all of his slender five feet seven inches in height, playing the titular character. If you were a reader of the books that might have been off-putting. In turn, what if Child had written Reacher as looking exactly like Tom Cruise? Would being so overly descriptive have turned off readers?

The same kind of consideration goes for the werewolf -to a point. That is to say my werewolves will be described. But there’s described, and then there’s the concrete vision that comes to mind in a reader’s head in terms of interpreting that description. This is a critical decision for a horror author. Once you get past the basics of things like two legged werewolf versus four legged, long wolf-like snout versus a more Lon Chaney type look then it’s up to you as to how much you will leave final interpretation open to the reader’s mind’s eye. Do you let the reader fill in the blanks with what they think is the best or scariest werewolf they’ve ever seen? Or do you spell out the beast’s dimensions and characteristics in detail? Whatever you do just remember that every author and reader is different in their opinion.

For instance, maybe you’re someone who thinks the Bernie Wrightson illustrated werewolf from the novella Cycle of the Werewolf is the be-all-end-all of werewolves:

Cycle-of-the-Werewolf

Others might think there is nothing scarier than special makeup effects creator Rob Bottin’s werewolf from the movie The Howling:

Howling_werewolf

What does the writer do? Go for broke like Stephen King and hire an illustrator to show exactly what the werewolf looks like – which for anyone that has read King’s werewolf novella knows was a break from his normal practice of barely physically describing the characters found in his full length novels.  If you decide to include illustrations do you maybe take a middle ground, and just show the creature’s clawed hand/paw or other such body parts teasing it out – with the full bodied pay-off at the end? Or do neither, nixing the idea of illustrations, and leaving it to the reader to best fit the creature’s outline to the mental image that terrifies them the most?

I’ll be honest here. In my book, and if I choose to not illustrate it, the text has described the creatures enough so that in my mind’s eye I’m seeing those particular werewolves that scare the devil out of me. In essence I’m writing for myself. But I’m also leaving it a bit open to interpretation, so that the Bernie Wrightson or Rob Bottin fans can fill in the final blanks.

From there, and beyond the look of your characters, beasts, and decisions about how much to reveal versus how much to show there are other considerations as well. If much of your action takes place in a central location how many of you think a map so similar to the one’s you find in a good fantasy novel would be  a nice touch? How many others wished more of your horror books had bibliographies where you could see the sources that influenced your favorite authors? What about the cover font? The text font? Page color? Decisions, decisions….

My hope is that by openly discussing some of these topics I will help other authors who are struggling with their own creative demons. Furthermore, it’s important for our readers to understand the effort that some authors put into trying to entertain them. Because entertaining the reader, and giving them something to think about, will always remain the ultimate goal in genres such as ours.

I can be found on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, email (smdouglas73@yahoo.com), or the comments section of this blog – I would love to hear from all of you.

 

Top Gun 30 Years Later: Was it Really the Best Cold War Film of It’s Era?

This month marks the 30th anniversary of the release of the iconic 1980’s film Top Gun – the highest grossing film of 1986, and a movie that seemingly defines the term “Cold War film” with it’s macho swagger and high tech military hardware.

Tom Cruise_Top Gun

With the popularity of current films and TV shows centered on the Cold War it’s not surprising that Top Gun has been getting so much attention in the mainstream media. Nevertheless, and though I very much enjoyed Top Gun there were many other 1980’s Cold War themed films that are often overlooked, and in many ways every bit as good. And if one were to put together a list of the best of these movies it would be incomplete without at least one of the following films:

War Games

War Games_NORAD War Room

A high school student who accidentally hacks into a NORAD supercomputer to play a simulated game of thermonuclear war instead nearly triggers World War III

The good: Original, fast paced, and entertaining – it was a superb movie. The film was so realistic that it even prompted President Reagan, to question US vulnerability to cyber attack and task the N.S.A. with studying the issue. The report that ended up coming out of this study was hardly reassuring.

The bad/ugly: The director messed up Galaga , interspersing sound effects with on-screen action that did not go together. In another scene F-15’s are mistaken for F-16’s – a total cold war no-no.

Firefox

 

firefox_Clint Eastwood

Clint Eastwood plays a U.S. pilot who is covertly infiltrated into the Soviet Union to steal a game changing jet fighter invisible to radar, faster than anything else in the sky, and which can be partially controlled by neural link.

The good: Dark, gritty, and featuring an action packed ending. In many ways the film is Top Gun’s closest competitor, given the similarity in it’s focus on high tech aerial warfare.

The bad/ugly: The special effects, though enjoyable at the time, do not hold up nearly as well as Top Gun’s scenes featuring actual front line military aircraft. Though to Firefox’s credit it attempts to portray what a Soviet military aircraft would look like, whereas Top Gun relies on U.S. manufactured aggressor squadron aircraft as stand in’s for actual Soviet Mig’s.

The Living Daylights

Living Daylights Poster

James Bond is led to believe that General Pushkin, the head of the KGB, is systematically killing British and American agents. But in an ensuing adventure taking Bond across Europe, North Africa, and Afghanistan he finds out reality is not what it seems.

The good: Perhaps the most underrated James Bond movie ever, and perhaps the most overlooked Bond. The film’s action scenes hold up much better than those in Bond’s that came even a few years before, and Dalton provides a much needed corrective to Roger Moore’s camp.

The bad/ugly: Maryam d’Abo’s Kara Milovy was far too weak of a Bond girl for a movie with pretensions of returning Bond to his grittier roots following the Roger Moore era.

In addition to the three films listed above one could add in any number of films including:

Rambo, First Blood Part’s II and III (the stick fighting scene at the start of the third Rambo installment was a classic and perhaps the best part of the movie), Rocky IV, Spies Like Us, Red Heat, Red Dawn, Invasion U.S.A., and so on…into the realm of classic B-movie late night viewing fare.

Is there something I missed? Feel free to join the conversation via the comments section, Facebook, or Twitter.

 

 

 

Older posts Newer posts

© 2024 S.M. Douglas

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑