S.M. Douglas

Welcome to the home of author S.M. Douglas.

Tag: Werewolf (page 5 of 6)

Apex Predator Update: The Horror Writer’s Journey

I’ve been getting questions about when my upcoming novel Apex Predator will be published. I am thrilled to say it will be soon. In the meantime I’m excited by my readers enthusiasm. However, let it be known that the writing process is an interesting one.  This is even more true once the manuscript is “complete”, for that’s when the real work begins.  Given the multitude of decisions I am currently agonizing over (regarding formatting, editing, cover art, fonts, and so on….) I will be regularly posting in the weeks to come about those final steps that go into trying to make a manuscript three years in the making into a book worth spending time on.

For instance, there are the decisions that need to be made surrounding the editing process.  For some authors it’s easy. They’re naturals, capable of producing a solid effort in just a couple of drafts. Horror author Steve Vance comes to mind. Last year I interviewed him for my blog Random Pop Culture (now incorporated into this website). I found myself simultaneously delighted as a reader, and insanely jealous as an author. That’s because Vance admitted that his editing process involves maybe a couple of drafts. On the other hand I have been over my book at least a dozen times in the past nine months. This includes the requisite month without looking at it, in hopes that fresh eyes will catch things they missed – and did they.

Perhaps because of this process I finally bit the bullet, and hired a professional editor. For financial reasons it was not an easy decision. However, I decided that if my book was to be the best product it possibly could then it needed professional editing. I have seen too many books where a good pair of objective eyes would have made all the difference. The same was true of mine. I sent my new editor a writing sample a few weeks ago. Though she said there was much to commend, she also came back with a host of questions and comments that made my head spin. The kind of stuff that was staring me right in the face, but which I missed because I was looking too hard.

By the way, the process of finding my new editor was actually relatively painless. Several months ago I joined the Create Space forum. So far I’ve asked for help twice – each time I have been inundated with wonderful guidance. In this case the advice also included a short list of editors worth looking into. This has taught me a valuable lesson about the importance of participating in writing forums and communities – a decision that has landed me a wonderful editor.

I know many of you will say sure an editor is great to have, but there’s the cost. And there’s no question about it, to pay for a pro is a far more costly step than getting your English major buddy to read over your MS. But trust me, it’s worth it. People talk about a book’s cover, but if they purchase that same book and every few pages something jarring smacks them in the face then it won’t take more than a matter of weeks before your Amazon page is littered with the kind of reviews that will sink years of effort.

Speaking of the book’s cover that’s another major consideration with it’s own set of headaches, but I’ll speak about that in the weeks to come. In the meantime I’ve been hemming and hawing over other decisions. These include whether to include black and white illustrations, maps, a bibliography, and much more. Please stay tuned, and feel free to give your opinions.

For instance, I would love to know how many of you find intriguing the idea of illustrations in a werewolf book. Or are you like Stephen King, and as he as often said the less described about your character’s appearance the better. The idea there being so that your reader can create their own mental images as to how characters look. This is a tricky decision, as can be seen by the following example.

In the best-selling Lee Child authored Jack Reacher books the protagonist is a big muscular brute of a man. But the subsequent film had Tom Cruise and all of his slender five feet seven inches in height, playing the titular character. If you were a reader of the books that might have been off-putting. In turn, what if Child had written Reacher as looking exactly like Tom Cruise? Would being so overly descriptive have turned off readers?

The same kind of consideration goes for the werewolf -to a point. That is to say my werewolves will be described. But there’s described, and then there’s the concrete vision that comes to mind in a reader’s head in terms of interpreting that description. This is a critical decision for a horror author. Once you get past the basics of things like two legged werewolf versus four legged, long wolf-like snout versus a more Lon Chaney type look then it’s up to you as to how much you will leave final interpretation open to the reader’s mind’s eye. Do you let the reader fill in the blanks with what they think is the best or scariest werewolf they’ve ever seen? Or do you spell out the beast’s dimensions and characteristics in detail? Whatever you do just remember that every author and reader is different in their opinion.

For instance, maybe you’re someone who thinks the Bernie Wrightson illustrated werewolf from the novella Cycle of the Werewolf is the be-all-end-all of werewolves:

Cycle-of-the-Werewolf

Others might think there is nothing scarier than special makeup effects creator Rob Bottin’s werewolf from the movie The Howling:

Howling_werewolf

What does the writer do? Go for broke like Stephen King and hire an illustrator to show exactly what the werewolf looks like – which for anyone that has read King’s werewolf novella knows was a break from his normal practice of barely physically describing the characters found in his full length novels.  If you decide to include illustrations do you maybe take a middle ground, and just show the creature’s clawed hand/paw or other such body parts teasing it out – with the full bodied pay-off at the end? Or do neither, nixing the idea of illustrations, and leaving it to the reader to best fit the creature’s outline to the mental image that terrifies them the most?

I’ll be honest here. In my book, and if I choose to not illustrate it, the text has described the creatures enough so that in my mind’s eye I’m seeing those particular werewolves that scare the devil out of me. In essence I’m writing for myself. But I’m also leaving it a bit open to interpretation, so that the Bernie Wrightson or Rob Bottin fans can fill in the final blanks.

From there, and beyond the look of your characters, beasts, and decisions about how much to reveal versus how much to show there are other considerations as well. If much of your action takes place in a central location how many of you think a map so similar to the one’s you find in a good fantasy novel would be  a nice touch? How many others wished more of your horror books had bibliographies where you could see the sources that influenced your favorite authors? What about the cover font? The text font? Page color? Decisions, decisions….

My hope is that by openly discussing some of these topics I will help other authors who are struggling with their own creative demons. Furthermore, it’s important for our readers to understand the effort that some authors put into trying to entertain them. Because entertaining the reader, and giving them something to think about, will always remain the ultimate goal in genres such as ours.

I can be found on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, email (smdouglas73@yahoo.com), or the comments section of this blog – I would love to hear from all of you.

 

Humanizing The Monsters

My daughter is of an age where questions are commonplace, especially following a movie. I have tried to avoid the Disney trap, but it seems virtually inescapable.  Thus, I have resigned myself to the fact that my daughter now watches Tangled, Frozen, Little Mermaid, and all the other “princess” movies. And don’t get me started on Frozen – I don’t know how they did it, but somehow the writers at Disney engineered a kind of princess crack cocaine for kids. Even the music from that cursed movie fills my house at all hours of the day.

Now don’t get me wrong, I wasn’t set on excluding princesses from her life – after all Princess Leia is a great independent, strong, female role model for a young girl. And thank god my daughter does like Princess Leia – and the Star Wars universe in general! It’s just that she also likes Elsa, Ariel, and all the rest of them. Such is life.

Nevertheless, over the last six months, and in the course of watching seventy odd years worth of Disney “princess” movies, what surprises me the most is that one of the many questions my daughter has asked following each of these viewings is always the same: “Why is “insert the villain’s name here” a bad person?”

Now in discussing the nature of “bad” with a preschool age child there is only so far you should go. Suffice it to say my answer generally revolves around a variant of: “Because she (invariably in a Disney movie the evildoer is a “she”) was trying to get Ariel, Rapunzel, etc… to do things that were against her own interest and which would hurt her or the people she cares about.”

You and I know exactly what these “bad” things were, and why they were being done. Characters like Ursula (Little Mermaid), or Mother Gothel (Tangled/Rapunzel) are sociopaths quite willing to do anything to further their own selfish goals. They are monsters. And like any monster some of them are quite horrible. Even scary. Don’t believe me. Watch Little Mermaid again. Ursula is downright creepy. And as she should be, given that she is basically an ocean witch.

It goes without saying that monsters should be scary. And for most of the past half-century or so the monsters populating our movies, books, graphic novels, comics, and so on are creatures out to devour or destroy humanity. The lone exception for much of this time was Godzilla, who went from ravishing Japanese cities to something of a folk hero staving off the assaults of other Kaiju type creatures.

But in recent years we have seen many other of the most famous monsters humanized. This is true to such an extant that if it were possible to bring Bram Stoker back from the grave he likely would be shocked to see the rendition of vampire’s in such popular films as Twilight.

Twilight_Edward

This picture was the scariest version of Edward “the vampire” I could find anywhere on the internet, and that was only by doing a search for “angry Edward images”. You try it. That’s a vampire at his meanest? Good grief.

We have even seen T-Rex go from monster in Jurassic Park….

T_Rex_Jurassic_Park_Image

…..to a Godzilla like hero in Jurassic World.

Indominus_VS_T._rex

And woe to Jurassic World’s producers had T-Rex met the same ignominious fate he suffered in Jurassic Park III – with T-Rex’s unlikely death at the hands of the longer but less massively muscled fish eating Spinosaurus one of the key reasons the third installment in the franchise is widely regarded as the worst.

Don’t get me wrong, there is a large and active backlash against cutesy versions of vampires, werewolves, and other such creatures:

Werewolves Vampires yesterday vs today

And thankfully, there are plenty of films and books that do everything possible to put the horror in horror. But given the larger role monsters often play as a means for understanding our place on this planet what does it say about our society that some of today’s greatest heroes are the same creatures that are ostensibly out to feed on us?

Perhaps inverting our heroes in such a way means we are learning that the worst monsters aren’t vampires, werewolves, or even Ursula the sea-witch. Perhaps it means the worst monsters are those that walk among us. You know who they are. Those respectable looking very serious individuals we are taught to listen to, but who in turn have done what for most of us in return?

Perhaps there is a reason horror is more popular than ever.

Perhaps it is because those bad people my daughter asks about, dare I say monsters, are all around us.

 

Was 1981 the Best Year in Horror Film History?

Here we are folks. I have been building toward this post for an entire year. Last October I discussed how 1981 featured several of the greatest werewolf films and transformations of all time. Then, this spring I waded into the controversy over two of the more iconic nature-horror films of all time: both featuring lions and both released in 1981.

At that point I probably could have stopped with quite a case built as to why 1981 was a great year for horror fans. But of course horror is much more than werewolves and animals run amok. For instance, I haven’t even mentioned as of yet perhaps the most successful horror genre of the past forty years – the slasher film. Largely kicked off by the October 1974 release of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre (which introduced several key elements of the genre – including murder by power tools and a powerful mask wearing killer) the genre exploded in popularity during the early 1980’s. Continue reading

First Place in Our Werewolf Book Countdown For This Holiday Season

Here we are! Two weeks ago I started this look at top werewolf books by analyzing my number three choice: The Howling.  Last week The Wolfen clocked in at number two. Today, and just in time for ordering your loved one a X-mas copy, is my top choice: The Hyde Effect.

The Hyde Effect_2000 Cover

First my obligatory commentary on the cover. The cover above is from the 2000 reprint. It’s not bad, but the edition I have from the book’s original publication in 1986 features the following cover:

The Hyde Effect My Versions Cover

Notice the difference. I hope you do, because the original more accurately conveys the shape shifting premise offered by the title. As an aside, sorry for the lousy picture, but for whatever reason I struggled to find online a better image. They say a good cover is worth a thousand words, and the problem I have with the 2000 version is that it looks like a duplicated shot of a wolf. If I am looking for a werewolf book and I see this cover I might just skip on by thinking “Hyde Effect and two wolves on the cover….hmmm….this looks like it could be about maybe a good wolf/bad wolf book, a government experiment featuring two wolves, or something else, but not necessarily a werewolf book.” This is an important lesson for you authors out there, make sure you are actively thinking about your book’s core audience and participating during the process of selecting your cover (if you can, some publishers are a bit more….how shall I say “controlling”).

It’s also a lesson to readers. Don’t be turned off by a bad cover; a good book could be lurking inside. Take the time to research or review the book; it might be worth your hard earned dollars. In this case author Steve Vance produced a winner nearly thirty years ago with The Hyde Effect’s first print run. Careful readers will note that since October I have profiled two werewolf books written in the 1970′s (and now one in the 1980’s, plus an honorable mention for another 1980’s book – Stephen King’s Cycle of the Werewolf) and favorably commented on several 1980’s werewolf films. These are big reasons why I consider the ten year’s running from the mid-1970s’ to mid-1980’s as the “golden age” of high quality werewolf themed entertainment. Now back to my review, and a note on methodology.

You may be wondering what criteria landed The Hyde Effect at number one on this list. After all, both The Howling and The Wolfen sold more books, and each spawned major feature films. The answer is quite simple: by a muzzle The Hyde Effect edged out The Wolfen as the scariest of the three books.  And I mean by a muzzle. The Wolfen came close to taking the top spot. And don’t think that I elevated The Hyde Effect to number one just because it meets some contrived purist’s definition of featuring a supernaturally created shape shifting werewolf. If you believe that then you are ignoring my wholehearted endorsement of The Wolfen, and it’s non-werewolves.

The werewolf in The Hyde Effect and the carnage he wreaks rises several terror notches above this book’s closest competitors. The Wolfen are scary to be sure, but they are basically predators. That means there is a reason for their killing; to eat and survive. Nothing more, nothing less. What’s more they kill only what they need, and just like real predators focus on the weakest and most isolated of their prey species. The only reason they kill otherwise is when certain animals make youthful mistakes, or if there is a risk of discovery. And though the werewolves in The Howling are nasty creatures, even when in werewolf form they are able to control their behavior.None of this is true in regards to the savage killing machine Vance has created.

Vance’s werewolf wipes out entire families in their homes, kills cops, doctors, and so on….it butchers people by the dozens. There is no regard for the person’s standing in life, whether or not there are other people nearby, whether or not the werewolf has just fed, or anything of the sort. You can be killed at any time or any place by this werewolf, as long as he is somewhere nearby and the clock has not run out on his monthly killing spree.

One could say how scary is that? It should be easy to find such a mindless terror. But Vance makes his human host a kind, thoughtful, intelligent man who takes all sorts of precautions in attempting to limit his once per month nocturnal activities. Some months he is even successful in isolating himself to such an extant he cannot make a kill. This further drives home the book’s title: Vance’s central character is a true Jekyll and Hyde. This is doubly true not only in terms of personality and morals but also makes him much harder to track than if he were like Gary Brandner’s Marcia; who in The Howling oozes sexuality and violence in whatever form she is in. In addition, by sticking to the conventional script, in regards to his werewolf only being able to change at midnight on the night of the full moon, Vance further limits his creature’s destructive power to a roughly five to seven hour period each month. This allows Vance to ramp up the book’s tension. Each month the full moon approaches, bringing the reader to a near feverish state of suspense again and again as Vance’s work winds it way through a series of bloody killings to reach it’s final act. And what a final act it is….

Without giving away too much of the plot a good chunk of the book’s second half takes place in a single physical location where the werewolf has an opportunity to feast upon over a hundred trapped people. The idea might sound weak but trust me, Vance makes it work. These people include the book’s heroes, who have been developed enough that by this point in the text you care about what happens to them. On top of that there is a side story running throughout the book about a mentally handicapped teenage boy of prodigious size, physical strength, and the motivation to use his power. He, and his sister who takes care of him, end up trapped with everyone else – where he confronts the werewolf as part of an epic battle running the entire night between werewolf on one side and over a hundred people on the other. Such is the savagery of the beast that it is hardly a fair fight; for the people.

If for no other reason than the book’s second part I cannot for the life of me understand why it has never been made into a movie. And this is not to ignore the book’s first half. As a stand alone read it does a great job of establishing the nature of the beast, the obstacles our heroes must tear down in their quest to reveal the truth of the murderous terror stalking the night, and in setting up the climactic confrontation that follows. If you like werewolves, or if you like feeling scared, you will not be able to put this book down. Does it have its faults? Sure. But in terms of pure entertainment I cannot recommend The Hyde Effect enough.

I first read all three of my recommendations, and Stephen King’s fourth place near miss, as a tween – or YA reader in today’s vernacular. They scared the crap out of me. I think I turned out reasonably well adjusted. Nevertheless, note to parents; none of these book’s were written for those under the age of 17. They all qualify as “R” rated. In particular The Howling contains a disturbing rape scene and graphic sexuality. Though each book is somewhat dated, and though the Internet makes available for viewing sexual practices and levels of violence I couldn’t even dream up back in my youth; this is not Twilight.  These are violent, scary works whose monsters still managed to put a fright in me when I reread each book as an adult. You are forewarned.

Now go forth and shop (or load up your browser, click on a few buttons, and call it shopping). Merry Christmas!

 

 

 

Three Must Read Werewolf Books for Your Holiday Shopping Season

In October I commented on two of the best werewolf transformation scenes of all time and then broke down one of the all time great werewolf movies – The Howling. To complete my series of werewolf themed posts I would like to change media formats; from movies to books.

More to the point, and in light of this being the silly season, if you have loved one’s who enjoy a good scare then I have three must read werewolf books any one of which would make a wonderful gift. In addition, and this being the season of lists, I have ranked them in my order of preference from third to first, with this post focusing on the third of my recommendations (and follow up posts tackling my top two choices):

3.) The Howling – by Gary Brandner

The_howling_book_cover

First off, for those of you clicking on the link provided above note that I have chosen to include the original book cover in this post (from its publication in 1977). This decision was made for a number of reasons. Most notably it is because the werewolf pictured on the cover of the 2011 edition looks nothing like the very wolfish four-legged werewolf described in the book. In that regard I think Brandner’s publisher did his work a disservice. On the other hand I am also a traditionalist, and enjoyed the simplicity of the original cover.

With that out of the way the book’s plot is fairly conventional in terms of many of its larger points – the werewolves can only transform at night, there is a clear progression of victims, etc…But beyond that the book does a number of things well, all of which elevate it to being quite a nice read.

Two of the most important decisions made by Brandner were discussed in my previous post regarding the 1981 movie “The Howling” which otherwise has little similarity to this book. That being the sheer malevolence of the werewolves, and their communal nature. Not to gloss over these decisions as they were truly innovative for their time – but again read the other post….Go ahead, I will wait….In the meantime I will discuss several other things Brandner did that were worthy of praise.

For one he crafted a tightly written work (at 200 plus pages) that absolutely nails the right mood and tone for a werewolf novel. The town of Drago, the home of the werewolves, is about as creepy as it gets. It is a genuinely scary place that exudes evil. That is to Brandner’s credit as a writer. Striking the proper atmospherics is one of the trickier aspects of writing, and Brandner nails it. Drago is the kind of place that if you stumbled across it you would promptly roll up the windows, lock the doors, and speed on through even as you tried to shrug off the inexplicable chill running up your spine.

In addition, in a book that features an almost pornographic sex scene and features a horrible act of violence against a woman Brandner manages to create a female protagonist named “Karyn Beatty” who is brave, sympathetic, and admirable enough that one almost forgets about the otherwise more sordid aspects of his work. Had her character been written the same way for the movie that she was for the book she might have gone down as another of that era’s great fictional female champions every bit as strong as her onscreen peers Ripley (Alien) and Sarah Connor (Terminator). This is because Brandner’s Karyn suffers through a series of tragic circumstances including: a rape and miscarriage; a less than supportive slut of a husband who ends up abandoning her during her time of greatest emotional need; the loss of her dog (who can’t sympathize with that); and one closed door after another everywhere she turns for help.  Yet through sheer force of will she overcomes. This strength of the book is perhaps the greatest failing of the movie version – as the film’s character Karen White (played by Dee Wallace-Stone) somehow comes across as more of a damsel in distress than a heroine.

Finally, I have to single out for special attention the book’s introduction. It is a tidy little vignette taking place hundreds of years ago in an Eastern European town named Dradja, and it is fantastic. I would rather have you read it then describe it. As much as this introduction pulls the reader in however, it leads into perhaps the book’s greatest fault. And as a side note on the book’s faults say what you want about Brandner’s decision to create werewolves that look like wolves – I prefer by far the film’s two-legged version of a werewolf – but for some reason the almost literal man into wolf somehow works here. Now back to the good stuff….

The introductory chapter setting the book’s back story was so well written, so horrifically compelling, and unfortunately brief that it left this reader wanting more. It is almost like he created an outline in that first chapter that easily could have been blown out into several large chunks inserted throughout the story; pacing the present with the past and in effect telling the twin stories of these evil towns (Dradja of the opening vignette and Drago of the novel’s main body) side by side. Yes this would have blown out the length of the book into something more Stephen Kingishly long, but in this case that wouldn’t have been a bad thing. As it was the horror in Dradja that Brandner dangles before the reader is so compelling that the rest of the book’ first act almost pales in comparison. And this is in spite of the horrific rape that otherwise dominates the first part of this work. In fact the book doesn’t really pick up again until we enter Drago, where Brandner regains his stride and carries the reader through a fast paced second and third acts.

For sure I would have loved to see Brandner follow-up and expand that opening scene into a full-blown novel or even a novella, but the book is still an enjoyable read (regrettably he passed away late last year at the age of 83). That is why I have the book “The Howling” at number three on my gift giving list for the werewolf fan. Please come back next week for my second selection.

Older posts Newer posts

© 2024 S.M. Douglas

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑